Microsoft Corporation v. VirnetX Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Virnetx Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

    CAUSE NO. 6:13-CV-351 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 17, 2014)   1 Legal Analyses

    CAUSE NO. 6:13-CV-351 12-17-2014 VIRNETX INC. and LEIDOS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,502,135 ("the '135 Patent"), 7,188,180 ("the '180 Patent"), 7,418,504 ("the '504 Patent"), 7,490,151 ("the '151 Patent"), 7,921,211 ("the '211 Patent"), and 7,987,274 ("the '274 Patent") (collectively, "the patents-in-suit"). On September

  2. Rule 41 - Dismissal of Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 41   Cited 118,478 times   205 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such dismissal "operates as an adjudication on the merits"
  3. Section 315 - Relation to other proceedings or actions

    35 U.S.C. § 315   Cited 554 times   901 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the Director to consolidate separate IPRs challenging the same patent
  4. Section 311 - Inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 311   Cited 410 times   205 Legal Analyses
    Establishing grounds and scope of IPR proceeding
  5. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 381 times   635 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"
  6. Section 42.108 - Institution of inter partes review

    37 C.F.R. § 42.108   Cited 46 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Permitting partial institution