§

Michigan Advertising Distributing Co.

134 N.L.R.B. 1289 (N.L.R.B. 1961)
Michigan Advertising Distributing Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  2. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  3. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 315 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

  4. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  5. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  6. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  7. Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union

    362 U.S. 274 (1960)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that § 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."

  8. Douds v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

    241 F.2d 278 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 64 times
    In Douds v. International Longshoremen's Association, 241 F.2d 278 (2d Cir. 1957), we upheld the district court's granting of a preliminary injunction sought by the Board against a union.

  9. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    280 F.2d 616 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 15038, 15079. Argued December 3, 1959. Decided May 19, 1960. Mr. Charles J. Morris, Dallas, Tex., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Texas, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Morris P. Glushien, New York City, and L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 15038. Mr. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Marcel Mallet-Prevost

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Esquire, Inc.

    222 F.2d 253 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 11 times

    No. 11318. April 29, 1955. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Julius Topol, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C., Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. Herman Smith, Sidney R. Zatz, Walter N. Kaufman, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before LINDLEY, SWAIM and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. SWAIM, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the National Labor Relations Board's petition for enforcement of its order directing