§

MI PUEBLO FOODS, INC.

360 N.L.R.B. 1097 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
MI PUEBLO FOODS, INC.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 630 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 269 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  4. Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.

    381 U.S. 676 (1965)   Cited 242 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding a marketing hours limitation contained in a multiemployer contract exempt from antitrust liability because its purpose was to protect the wages, hours, and working conditions of the union's members

  5. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  6. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

  7. Specialty Tires v. CIT Group/Equi. Fina

    248 F.3d 1131 (3d Cir. 2000)   Cited 37 times
    Denying request to inspect grand jury voting record when the defendant failed to demonstrate a "particularized need"

  8. Spurlino Materials, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    645 F.3d 870 (7th Cir. 2011)   Cited 10 times
    Establishing new employee evaluation system was mandatory subject of bargaining

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Royal Plating Polishing Co.

    350 F.2d 191 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 43 times
    In NLRB v. Royal Plating Polishing Co., Inc., 350 F.2d 191, 196 (3d Cir. 1965), the court characterized a company's decision to close a plant when "faced with the economic necessity of either moving or consolidating the operations of a failing business" as a "management decision which [is] fundamental to the basic direction of a corporate enterprise" and which lies "at the core of entrepreneurial control.

  10. Louisiana-Pacific Corp., W. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    52 F.3d 255 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 8 times
    Distinguishing between the "basis" for an agency order, which is limited by the Chenery rule, and an agency "finding," which is reviewed for "substantial evidence"