§

MI PUEBLO FOODS, INC.

32-CA-025677 (N.L.R.B. Feb. 9, 2012)
MI PUEBLO FOODS, INC.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 631 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 733 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 270 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  4. Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.

    381 U.S. 676 (1965)   Cited 243 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding a marketing hours limitation contained in a multiemployer contract exempt from antitrust liability because its purpose was to protect the wages, hours, and working conditions of the union's members

  5. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  6. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

  7. Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 6 times
    Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Royal Plating Polishing Co.

    350 F.2d 191 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 43 times
    In NLRB v. Royal Plating Polishing Co., Inc., 350 F.2d 191, 196 (3d Cir. 1965), the court characterized a company's decision to close a plant when "faced with the economic necessity of either moving or consolidating the operations of a failing business" as a "management decision which [is] fundamental to the basic direction of a corporate enterprise" and which lies "at the core of entrepreneurial control.

  9. Brockway Motor Trucks, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    582 F.2d 720 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that closing down of an employer's plant falls within statutory phrase "terms and conditions of employment"

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Adams Dairy, Inc.

    350 F.2d 108 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 31 times
    In NLRB v. Adams Dairy, Inc., 350 F.2d 108 (8 Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 1011, 86 S.Ct. 619, 15 L.Ed.2d 526 (1966), we held that in the absence of union animus, a company has no legal duty to bargain with a union over the decision to partially shut down its operations because of economic reasons.