§

MGM Grand Hotel, LLC d/b/a MGM Grand

28-CA-186022 (N.L.R.B. Oct. 29, 2019)
MGM Grand Hotel, LLC d/b/a MGM Grand

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  4. U.S. v. Milton

    8 F.3d 39 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 35 times
    Finding no Confrontation Clause violation and upholding admission of prior statements under Federal Evidence Rule 801(d) when the witness testified at trial and was subject to cross-examination but could not remember events or prior statements

  5. Medeco Sec. Locks v. National Lab. rel

    142 F.3d 733 (4th Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that no substantial evidence of knowledge could be inferred from the company's decision to fire a worker within a year after he had ceased to be a visible supporter of the union and had disavowed further interest in the union

  6. Ready Mixed Concrete v. Nat. Lab. Rel. Bd.

    81 F.3d 1546 (10th Cir. 1996)   Cited 24 times
    Imputing supervisor's knowledge of employee's union activities to company where supervisor had anti-union animus, but acknowledging that decision-maker admitted he probably knew of employee's union activities

  7. Beneli v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    873 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 2017)   Cited 2 times

    No. 15-73426. 10-17-2017 Coletta Kim BENELI, Petitioner, v. The NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co., Inc., Respondent-Intervenor. Myron L. Scott (argued), Law Office of Myron Scott, Tempe, Arizona, for Petitioner. Ruth E. Burdick (argued), Deputy Assistant General Counsel; Heather S. Beard, Attorney; Robert J. Engleheart, Supervisory Attorney; Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel; John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel; Jennifer Abruzzo

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. La-Z-Boy Midwest

    390 F.3d 1054 (8th Cir. 2004)   Cited 13 times
    Describing the NLRB's burden-shifting analysis of Wright Line, 251 N.L.R.B. 1083, enforced, 662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 989, 102 S.Ct. 1612, 71 L.Ed.2d 848

  9. Int'l Union v. N.L.R.B

    514 F.3d 574 (6th Cir. 2008)   Cited 6 times

    No. 06-2156. Submitted: September 14, 2007. Decided and Filed: January 28, 2008. ON BRIEF: Bruce A. Miller, Robert P. Fetter, Miller Cohen, Detroit, Michigan, for Petitioners. Aileen A. Armstrong, Robert J. Englehart, Gregory P. Lauro, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Sean F. Crotty, Honigman, Miller, Schwartz Cohn, Detroit, Michigan, for Intervenor. Before: NORRIS, GIBBONS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges. GIBBONS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which NORRIS

  10. L. U. 1392, Intern, Bro. of Elec. v. N.L.R.B

    786 F.2d 733 (6th Cir. 1986)   Cited 2 times

    No. 85-5221. Argued February 13, 1986. Decided March 26, 1986. Laurence J. Cohen, Robert D. Kurnick, Victoria L. Bor, argued, Sherman, Dunn, Cohen, Leifer Counts, P.C., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Guy Farmer, argued, Jonathan A. Cohen, Vedder, Price, Kaufman, Kammholz Day, Washington, D.C., and Frederic L. Sagan, Sr. Labor Counsel, American Elec. Power Ser. Corp., Columbus, Ohio, for intervenor. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., and Fred Havard, argued