Mezonos Maven Bakery

28 Cited authorities

Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida
517 U.S. 44 (1996) Cited 5,234 times 23 Legal Analyses
Holding that Congress cannot abrogate state-sovereign immunity under its Article I commerce power, and rejecting the result in Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. , 491 U.S. 1, 109 S.Ct. 2273, 105 L.Ed.2d 1, seven years later; the decision in Union Gas never garnered a majority
Los Angeles Cty., Ca. v. Humphries
562 U.S. 29 (2010) Cited 813 times
Holding that "the `policy or custom' requirement also applies when plaintiffs seek prospective relief, such as an injunction or a declaratory judgment," and not just monetary damages
Edison Co. v. Labor Board
305 U.S. 197 (1938) Cited 19,456 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay
Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
535 U.S. 137 (2002) Cited 324 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that backpay awards to undocumented workers terminated in violation of the National Labor Relations Act ran counter to federal immigration law
Aka v. Washington Hospital Center
156 F.3d 1284 (D.C. Cir. 1998) Cited 1,163 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that "a plaintiff's discrediting of an employer's stated reason for its employment decision is entitled to considerable weight"
Sure-Tan, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
467 U.S. 883 (1984) Cited 420 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge
De Canas v. Bica
424 U.S. 351 (1976) Cited 484 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a California law prohibiting an employer from knowingly employing an illegal alien was not unconstitutional as a regulation of immigration or as being preempted under the Supremacy Clause
Labor Board v. Laughlin
301 U.S. 1 (1937) Cited 1,504 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis
Rivera v. Nibco, Inc.
364 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2004) Cited 405 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding employee immigration status was not discoverable in a Title VII action because forcing employees to reveal such information could deter undocumented workers from filing complaints about labor and civil rights violations and the information was not relevant to the issue of liability
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.
396 U.S. 258 (1969) Cited 185 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."
Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1182 Cited 9,994 times 79 Legal Analyses
Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
Section 1324a - Unlawful employment of aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1324a Cited 595 times 50 Legal Analyses
Authorizing the Attorney General to pursue injunctive relief and criminal sanctions in federal district court

Mezonos Maven Bakery

28 Cited authorities

Holding that Congress cannot abrogate state-sovereign immunity under its Article I commerce power, and rejecting the result in Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. , 491 U.S. 1, 109 S.Ct. 2273, 105 L.Ed.2d 1, seven years later; the decision in Union Gas never garnered a majority

Holding that "the `policy or custom' requirement also applies when plaintiffs seek prospective relief, such as an injunction or a declaratory judgment," and not just monetary damages

Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

Holding that backpay awards to undocumented workers terminated in violation of the National Labor Relations Act ran counter to federal immigration law

Holding that "a plaintiff's discrediting of an employer's stated reason for its employment decision is entitled to considerable weight"

Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge

Holding that a California law prohibiting an employer from knowingly employing an illegal alien was not unconstitutional as a regulation of immigration or as being preempted under the Supremacy Clause

Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis

Finding employee immigration status was not discoverable in a Title VII action because forcing employees to reveal such information could deter undocumented workers from filing complaints about labor and civil rights violations and the information was not relevant to the issue of liability

Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."

Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

Authorizing the Attorney General to pursue injunctive relief and criminal sanctions in federal district court