§

Meyers Bros. of Missouri, Inc.

151 N.L.R.B. 889 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Meyers Bros. of Missouri, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 962 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  4. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 318 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Downtown Bakery Corp.

    330 F.2d 921 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 28 times
    In Downtown Bakery, the court upheld the policy of the NLRB that the employer, faced with competing demands for recognition, violated sections 8(a)(1), (2), and (3) of the Act by executing and maintaining a collective bargaining agreement with a rival union.

  6. Local 636, Plumbing Pipe v. N.L.R.B

    287 F.2d 354 (D.C. Cir. 1961)   Cited 27 times

    Nos. 15665, 15707. Argued December 1, 1960. Decided January 19, 1961. Petition for Rehearing Denied March 22, 1961. Mr. Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Martin F. O'Donoghue and Thomas X. Dunn, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 15,665. Mr. Morton Namrow, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board,

  7. Bernhardt Bros. Tugboat Service v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 757 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 5 times

    No. 14235. February 27, 1964. V. Lee McMahon, St. Louis, Mo., McMahon Zempel, St. Louis, Mo., of counsel, for petitioner. Harold Gruenberg, Gruenberg, Schobel Souders, St. Louis, Mo., for Inland Boatmen's Union of Seafarers' International Union, Atlantic, Gulf, Lakes and Inland Waters District, AFL-CIO, as amicus curiae. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Leo N. McGuire, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Trosch

    321 F.2d 692 (4th Cir. 1963)   Cited 5 times

    No. 8894. Argued June 12, 1963. Decided August 19, 1963. Arthur M. Goldberg, Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., National Labor Relations Board, on brief), for petitioner. James J. Doherty (Friedman Goodman on brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges. BOREMAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  9. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,104 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"