§

Meurer, Serafini and Meurer, Inc.

224 N.L.R.B. 1373 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
Meurer, Serafini and Meurer, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Interboro Contractors, Inc.

    388 F.2d 495 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 80 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Interboro Contractors, Inc., 388 F.2d 495, 500 (2d Cir. 1967), the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit stated that the efforts of an individual employee acting alone to enforce the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement may be deemed "concerted," and thus protected, at least when the individual's interpretation of the agreement has a reasonable basis.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Guernsey-Muskingum Electric Co-op

    285 F.2d 8 (6th Cir. 1960)   Cited 58 times
    Finding concerted activity because "a reasonable inference can be drawn that the men involved considered that they had a grievance and decided, among themselves, that they would take it up with management"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Buddies Supermarkets, Inc.

    481 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 34 times
    In Buddies Supermarkets, employee Smith was discharged for causing dissention among his co-workers after failing to gain a more favorable contract for himself. The ALJ held that the employee was discharged for engaging in section 7 protected concerted activity, and the Board affirmed.

  4. Mushroom Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 683 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times
    In Mushroom Transportation Co. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 683, 685 (3d Cir. 1964), we held that to qualify as concerted activity "it must appear at the very least that [the conduct] was engaged in with the object of initiating or inducing or preparing for group action or that it had some relation to group action in the interest of the employees."

  5. Hugh H. Wilson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 1345 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 37 times
    Finding concerted activity because "[i]n substance, the employees had a gripe. They assembled. They presented their grievance to management. . . ."

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Northern Metal Company

    440 F.2d 881 (3d Cir. 1971)   Cited 34 times
    In N. L. R. B. v. Northern Metal Company, 440 F.2d at 884-85, the Court, branding the finding of "constructive concerted activity" in Interboro as a pure "legal fiction," said it was "unwilling to adopt such a fiction.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. C I Air Conditioning, Inc.

    486 F.2d 977 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 13 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. C I Air Conditioning, Inc., supra, 486 F.2d 977, 978, the court recognized the "emergence of [the Interboro] rule" but found it unnecessary to follow.

  8. B. P. Motor Express Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    413 F.2d 1021 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 1 times

    No. 17045. July 24, 1969. George Gregory Mantho, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before KILEY and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges, and HOFFMAN, District Judge. Judge Hoffman is sitting by designation from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. JULIUS J. HOFFMAN, District Judge. The employer, B. P. Motor Express, Inc., has petitioned for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, and the Board