5 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.
344 U.S. 344 (1953) Cited 368 timesUpholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding
Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 506 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
Labor Board v. Mackay Co.
304 U.S. 333 (1938) Cited 535 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
Local Un. 219, Retail Clerks Int. v. N.L.R.B
265 F.2d 814 (D.C. Cir. 1959) Cited 10 timesNo. 14481. Argued December 15, 1958. Decided March 19, 1959. Mr. S.G. Lippman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mr. Joseph E. Finley, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Owsley Vose, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.
120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941) Cited 15 timesNo. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys