4 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.
356 U.S. 342 (1958) Cited 296 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under ยง 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.
343 U.S. 395 (1952) Cited 269 timesHolding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"
Local 164, Bhd. of Painters v. N.L.R.B
293 F.2d 133 (D.C. Cir. 1961) Cited 9 timesNo. 15643. Argued December 2, 1960. Decided April 27, 1961. Certiorari Denied October 9, 1961. See 82 S.Ct. 42. Mr. James F. Carroll, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and James C. Paras, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Before WILBUR
Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
291 F.2d 128 (1st Cir. 1961) Cited 6 timesNo. 5704. June 6, 1961. Gerard D. Reilly, Washington, D.C., with whom Lawrence T. Zimmerman, Washington, D.C., Charles Hansen and Bruce Carswell, New York City, and Reilly Wells, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, and Duane B. Beeson and Vincent W. Bradley, Attorneys, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY