Holly Farms Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that where statute's meaning is obvious, courts and Board must defer to Congress's unambiguous intent, but where ambiguity exists, courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the statute

Labor Board v. Parts Co.

Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

Lunney, an Infant v. Prodigy Services Co.

N.L.R.B. v. McCullough Environmental Serv

Concluding that statement that "things were going to get a lot tougher around here" upon unionization constituted a threat

N.L.R.B. v. Calkins

Recognizing that Nevada law does not extend special protection to free speech interests at the expense of a private store owner's property interest

N.L.R.B. v. St. Francis Healthcare Centre

Observing that an employer’s "own campaign literature distributed after August 6 obviated any threat to reduce or eliminate benefits before bargaining began"

National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Upholding the Board's finding that a company committed an unfair labor practice by videotaping union rallies without sufficient justification