Meredith Corp.

15 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.
388 U.S. 26 (1967) Cited 322 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.
373 U.S. 221 (1963) Cited 358 times 1 Legal Analyses
Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.
389 U.S. 375 (1967) Cited 233 times
In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
Chevron Oil, v. N.L.R.B
442 F.2d 1067 (5th Cir. 1971) Cited 24 times
In Chevron Oil Co. v. N.L.R.B., 442 F.2d 1067, 1072 n. 10 (5th Cir. 1971), a company's good faith was evidenced in part by its having successfully negotiated contracts containing the challenged provisions with three other affiliates of the same union.
National Labor Rel. Board v. Gaynor News Co.
197 F.2d 719 (2d Cir. 1952) Cited 45 times
In Gaynor it was conceded that the sole criterion for extra payments was union membership, and the vacation payments were admittedly gratuitous.
Flambeau Plastics Corporation v. N.L.R.B
401 F.2d 128 (7th Cir. 1969) Cited 15 times
No. 16560. August 2, 1968. Certiorari Denied January 13, 1969. See 89 S.Ct. 625. Walter S. Davis, Russ R. Mueller, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. Kenneth R. Loebel, Richard M. Goldberg, Milwaukee, Wis., Goldberg, Previant Uelmen, Milwaukee, Wis., for intervenor. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy S. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Leon M. Kestenbaum, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before CASTLE, Chief
Kroger Company v. N.L.R.B
401 F.2d 682 (6th Cir. 1968) Cited 10 times
Nos. 17895-18011. October 10, 1968. Nicholas Unkovic, Pittsburgh, Pa., (Leonard L. Scheinholtz, Scott F. Zimmerman, Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., J. Mack Swigert, Taft, Stettinius Hollister, Cincinnati, Ohio, Norman Diamond, Arnold Porter, Washington, D.C., William Keller, Clark, West, Keller, Clark Ginsberg, Dallas, Tex., on the brief), George A. Leonard, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel, for Kroger Company. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (Lester Asher, Chicago, Ill., for Retail Clerks
N.L.R.B. v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc.
429 F.2d 1223 (3d Cir. 1970) Cited 8 times
No. 17999. Argued April 9, 1970. Decided July 20, 1970. William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Peter Ames Eveleth, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. James H. Yauch, Jr., Yauch Fagan, Newark, N.J. (James F.X. O'Brien, Associate Counsel, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for respondent. Before SEITZ and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges, and LATCHUM, District Judge. OPINION
Melville Confections, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
327 F.2d 689 (7th Cir. 1964) Cited 12 times
No. 14252. January 29, 1964. Rehearing Denied March 3, 1964. Frederick W. Turner, Jr., Murray B. Woolley, Chicago, Ill., for Melville Confections, Inc. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Solomon I. Hirsh, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Harold B. Shore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before SCHNACKENBERG, KNOCH and CASTLE, Circuit Judges. CASTLE, Circuit Judge. This case is before the
Dura Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
380 F.2d 970 (6th Cir. 1967) Cited 5 times
In Dura Corp. v. NLRB, 380 F.2d 970 (6th Cir. 1967), participation in the Company's Profit-Sharing Plan for Executive and Salaried Personnel was restricted to employees who were not in a bargaining unit recognized by the Company.
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,091 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Meredith Corp.

15 Cited authorities

Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

In Chevron Oil Co. v. N.L.R.B., 442 F.2d 1067, 1072 n. 10 (5th Cir. 1971), a company's good faith was evidenced in part by its having successfully negotiated contracts containing the challenged provisions with three other affiliates of the same union.

In Gaynor it was conceded that the sole criterion for extra payments was union membership, and the vacation payments were admittedly gratuitous.

In Dura Corp. v. NLRB, 380 F.2d 970 (6th Cir. 1967), participation in the Company's Profit-Sharing Plan for Executive and Salaried Personnel was restricted to employees who were not in a bargaining unit recognized by the Company.

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"