Merchants Truck Line, Inc.
2 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
National Labor Board v. Glen Raven Silk Mills
203 F.2d 946 (4th Cir. 1953) Cited 1 timesNo. 6575. Argued April 9, 1953. Decided May 6, 1953. Edward D. Friedman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, and John Francis Lawless, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (William E. Anglin, Burnsville, N.C., and Pierce Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C., on the