§

Memphis Truck & Trailer, Inc., Memphis White Leasing, Inc., And Memphis Freightliner, Inc.

284 N.L.R.B. 900 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Memphis Truck & Trailer, Inc., Memphis White Leasing, Inc., And Memphis Freightliner, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Labor Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.

    360 U.S. 203 (1959)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that "dealing with" as used in 29 U.S.C. § 152 is a "broad term" and is not synonymous to "bargaining with"

  4. Labor Board v. Mine Workers

    355 U.S. 453 (1958)   Cited 47 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 64. Argued January 6, 1958. Decided February 3, 1958. The National Labor Relations Board found that an employer had committed an unfair labor practice by assisting a union to defeat the efforts of a rival union to organize the employer's workers, but that the assisted union was not dominated by the employer. It ordered the employer to post certain notices and to withdraw and withhold recognition from the assisted

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Streamway Division of the Scott & Fetzer Co.

    691 F.2d 288 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 10 times
    Assuming domination where committee "was expressly mandated by the Company, and the Company controlled its composition and its meetings"

  6. Lawson Co. v. N.L.R.B

    753 F.2d 471 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 83-5677, 83-5808. Argued November 28, 1984. Decided January 21, 1985. Michael T. McMenamin (argued), William Gorenc, Jr., Walter, Haverfield, Buescher Chockley, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Marjorie Gofreed, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MARTIN, JONES and CONTIE, Circuit Judges. BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge. The Lawson Company petitions this court to review and set aside an order of the

  7. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,874 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions