Meisner Electric, Inc.

Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S.S. Co.
337 U.S. 656 (1949) Cited 88 times
Holding "total rejection of an opposed view cannot of itself impugn the integrity or competence of a trier of fact"
Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990) Cited 20 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"
Altman Camera Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
511 F.2d 319 (7th Cir. 1975) Cited 5 times
No. 73-2121. Heard November 19, 1974. Decided February 26, 1975. Lester Asher and Stephen B. Rubin, Chicago, Ill., for intervenor. Arthur B. Muchin, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Elliott Moore and Joseph E. Mayer, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before SWYGERT and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges, and WYZANSKI, Senior District Judge. Senior District Judge Charles E. Wyzanski, Jr. of the District of Massachusetts is sitting by designation
Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest
26 U.S.C. § 6621 Cited 1,892 times 23 Legal Analyses
Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions