MEI-GSR HOLDINGS, LLC D/B/A GRAND SIERRA RESORT & CASINO/HG STAFFING, LLC

9 Cited authorities

  1. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent
  2. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity
  3. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
  4. Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.

    318 U.S. 9 (1943)   Cited 108 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."
  5. Brady v. Nat'l. Football League

    644 F.3d 661 (8th Cir. 2011)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that "a lawsuit filed in good faith by a group of employees to achieve more favorable terms or conditions of employment is 'concerted activity' under 29 U.S.C. § 157"
  6. Mohave Electric Cooperative v. N.L.R.B

    206 F.3d 1183 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 25 times
    Filing petition for injunction against employer harassment supported by fellow employees and joined by a co-worker was protected concerted activity
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation
  8. Section 207.200 - Unlawful trespass upon land; warning against trespassing

    Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.200   Cited 34 times
    Providing that a person commits a trespass by willfully going onto another's property "after having been warned by the owner or occupant thereof not to trespass"
  9. Section 463.4076 - Admission of patrons to gaming salon: Conditions; restrictions; resolution of disputes

    Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.4076

    1. The admission of a patron to a gaming salon: (a) May be restricted on the basis of the financial criteria of the patron as established by the licensee and approved by the Board; and (b) Must not be restricted on the basis of the race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression of the patron. 2. Any unresolved dispute with a patron concerning restriction of admission to a gaming salon shall be deemed a dispute as to