Medicine Bow Coal Co.

24 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
421 U.S. 132 (1975) Cited 2,077 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that FOIA does not compel agencies to write or create material to explain disclosed documents
S. Constr. Co. v. Gen. Elec. Co.
390 U.S. 955 (1968) Cited 89 times
Relying on § 10(b) of the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (b)
J. H. RUTTER REX MFG. CO., INC. v. N.L.R.B
473 F.2d 223 (5th Cir. 1973) Cited 43 times
In J.H. Rutter Rex Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 473 F.2d 223 (5th Cir. 1973), a group of claimants had worked at lower paying jobs following their unlawful discharges.
N.L.R.B. v. Interboro Contractors, Inc.
432 F.2d 854 (2d Cir. 1970) Cited 46 times
Holding that while discovery is not available as a constitutional right in administrative proceedings under the National Labor Relations Act, Section 6 of the Act grants the N.L.R.B. discretionary power to promulgate discovery rules to carry out its purposes
Huff v. N. D. Cass Company of Alabama
468 F.2d 172 (5th Cir. 1972) Cited 34 times
In Huff v. N. D. Cass Co. of Alabama, 468 F.2d 172 (1972) the Fifth Circuit recognized and approved such a hearing-on-the-merits procedure to aid the district court in its resolution of the issue as to whether the suit should be allowed to proceed as a class action under F.R.Civ.P. 23.
N.L.R.B. v. SEINE LINE FISHERMEN'S UN
374 F.2d 974 (9th Cir. 1967) Cited 39 times
Responding party not prejudiced when allowed to question witnesses regarding prior statements taken by the General Counsel or by counsel for charging party
N.L.R.B. v. SAFWAY STEEL SCAFFOLDS CO. OF GA
383 F.2d 273 (5th Cir. 1967) Cited 34 times
In NLRB v. Safway Steel Scaffolds Co., 383 F.2d 273 (5th Cir. 1967), we found "there was no showing of a proclivity to violate the Act or certain sections of the Act," id. at 282, where the employer had refused to bargain in good faith by threatening and then enforcing a wage reduction and by firing seven striking employees.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Rex Disposables
494 F.2d 588 (5th Cir. 1974) Cited 22 times
Allowing complaint alleging threats, layoffs, coercive interrogations, and surveillance of union meetings to stand despite dismissal of charges filed by union alleging specific layoffs of five employees because of union activity
Electromec Design and Dev. Co. v. N.L.R.B
409 F.2d 631 (9th Cir. 1969) Cited 24 times
No. 22464. March 27, 1969. R.L. Hofvendahl (argued), of Cottrell, Hofvendahl Roessler, San Jose, Cal., for petitioner. Leon M. Kestenbaum (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Lawrence M. Joseph, Atty., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before JERTBERG and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge. Hon. William M. Byrne, Senior United States District Judge, sitting
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Globe Wireless
193 F.2d 748 (9th Cir. 1951) Cited 42 times
No. 12736. December 27, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Albert M. Dreyer, Attorneys, NL RB, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gregory A. Harrison, Richard Ernst, Malcolm T. Dungan and Brobeck, Phleger Harrison, all of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges and LEMMON, District Judge. HEALY, Circuit Judge. This matter is before us on petition of the National
Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings
5 U.S.C. § 552 Cited 12,434 times 559 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,095 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Medicine Bow Coal Co.

24 Cited authorities

Holding that FOIA does not compel agencies to write or create material to explain disclosed documents

Relying on § 10(b) of the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (b)

In J.H. Rutter Rex Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 473 F.2d 223 (5th Cir. 1973), a group of claimants had worked at lower paying jobs following their unlawful discharges.

Holding that while discovery is not available as a constitutional right in administrative proceedings under the National Labor Relations Act, Section 6 of the Act grants the N.L.R.B. discretionary power to promulgate discovery rules to carry out its purposes

In Huff v. N. D. Cass Co. of Alabama, 468 F.2d 172 (1972) the Fifth Circuit recognized and approved such a hearing-on-the-merits procedure to aid the district court in its resolution of the issue as to whether the suit should be allowed to proceed as a class action under F.R.Civ.P. 23.

Responding party not prejudiced when allowed to question witnesses regarding prior statements taken by the General Counsel or by counsel for charging party

Allowing complaint alleging threats, layoffs, coercive interrogations, and surveillance of union meetings to stand despite dismissal of charges filed by union alleging specific layoffs of five employees because of union activity

Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"