§

Mechanical Contractors Association of Newburgh

202 N.L.R.B. 1 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
Mechanical Contractors Association of Newburgh

23 Cited authorities

  1. Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.

    363 U.S. 574 (1960)   Cited 5,628 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”

  2. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills

    353 U.S. 448 (1957)   Cited 2,326 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 301 expresses a federal policy in favor of the enforceability of labor contracts

  3. Boys Markets v. Clerks Union

    398 U.S. 235 (1970)   Cited 857 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Norris–LaGuardia Act's anti-injunction provisions do not bar enforcement of arbitration agreements

  4. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 632 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  5. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 734 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  6. Carey v. Westinghouse Corp.

    375 U.S. 261 (1964)   Cited 365 times
    Holding that Section 301 gives a federal court jurisdiction over a suit to enforce an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement even if the case is "truly a representation case" that could also be heard by the NLRB under Section 9 of the NLRA

  7. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 325 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  8. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”

  10. Parks v. Int'l Brotherhood of Electrical Wkrs

    314 F.2d 886 (4th Cir. 1963)   Cited 121 times
    In Parks, the local union sued its international for having revoked the local's charter and chartered another local in place of the plaintiff local, which had engaged in an unauthorized strike.