§
Mears Coal Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Frontier Guard Patrol, Inc.

    399 F.2d 716 (10th Cir. 1968)   Cited 2 times

    No. 9742. August 23, 1968. Burton Raimi, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Provost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore and Thomas Smith, Attys., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. V.G. Seavy, Jr., Denver, Colo., for respondents. Before PHILLIPS, HILL and HICKEY, Circuit Judges. ORIE L. PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court on petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order against

  3. Huberta Coal Company v. N.L.R.B

    408 F.2d 793 (6th Cir. 1969)

    No. 18415. April 1, 1969. John P. Cinque, Jr., Bellaire, Ohio, for petitioners; Cinque, Banker Linch, Bellaire, Ohio, on brief. Burton L. Raimi, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Michael N. Sohn, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Before O'SULLIVAN, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. ORDER This Cause is before us upon petition of Huberta Coal Company, Inc. and

  4. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"