§
Mead Packaging

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Mullins

    455 U.S. 72 (1982)   Cited 360 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, if a contract to contribute to union funds arose from an obligation that was illegal under the antitrust or labor laws, enforcing that contract would command unlawful conduct

  3. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  4. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  5. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"

  6. Local 900, Intern. U. of Elec., v. N.L.R.B

    727 F.2d 1184 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 61 times
    Holding that party's objection, though somewhat vague, was statutorily sufficient

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees, Local 338

    531 F.2d 1162 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 38 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Milk Drivers, an 8(a)(3) violation was established where it was found that by becoming a "good" union member, see Radio Officers' Union, supra, 347 U.S. at 40, 74 S.Ct. at 335, an individual had the opportunity to become a shop steward and thus obtain super-seniority.

  8. Mullins v. Kaiser Steel Corp.

    642 F.2d 1302 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 22 times
    In Mullins, the defendant, a coal producer, agreed to make contributions to United Mine Worker health and retirement funds based in part on the quantity of coal it purchased from non-union producers.

  9. D'Amico v. N.L.R.B

    582 F.2d 820 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 15 times
    In D'Amico, we adopted the Board's position that superseniority provisions for union officers "breach the neutrality mandated by the [NLRA] by tying the very substantial benefit of job retention to a particular type of membership in good standing — union activism to the extent of seeking to be elected a union officer."

  10. Section 186 - Restrictions on financial transactions

    29 U.S.C. § 186   Cited 2,360 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting payments to labor union officials