McMullen Leavens Co.

13 Cited authorities

Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 871 times
Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
Fed. Land Bank v. Bismarck Co.
314 U.S. 95 (1941) Cited 321 times
Holding that "the term ‘including’ is not one of all-embracing definition, but connotes simply an illustrative application of the general principle."
Labor Board v. Tower Co.
329 U.S. 324 (1946) Cited 259 times
Describing the Board's goals for its election rules and regulations
H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 514 (1941) Cited 241 times 1 Legal Analyses
In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.
Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.
264 U.S. 109 (1924) Cited 244 times
Holding that states can regulate maritime insurance provided the regulations do not "conflict with any essential feature of the general maritime law"
Helvering v. Morgan's, Inc.
293 U.S. 121 (1934) Cited 139 times
Recognizing that "the term `includes' may sometimes be taken as synonymous with `means'"
Marine Transit Co. v. Dreyfus
284 U.S. 263 (1932) Cited 89 times
Concluding that seizure of the vessel was the first step in enforcing arbitration, and explaining that it was not necessary for the arbitration panel to "split" the in personam claim against the corporation and the in rem claim against the vessel
United States v. Gleason
175 U.S. 588 (1900) Cited 98 times
In United States v. Gleason, 1900, 175 U.S. 588, 20 S.Ct. 228, 44 L.Ed. 284, the Supreme Court upheld a contract provision giving to the engineer the final and conclusive right to determine the fact of the contractor's conduct as warranting an extension of time beyond that agreed for the completion of the work, but stated the law to be that such finality existed only "in the absence of fraud or of mistake so gross as to necessarily imply bad faith."
Merrill-Ruckgaber Co. v. United States
241 U.S. 387 (1916) Cited 46 times
In Merrill-Ruckgaber Co. v. United States, 241 U.S. 387, 36 S.Ct. 662, 663, 60 L.Ed. 1058, the contract provided that "the decision of the supervising architect as to the proper interpretation of the drawings and specifications [shall] be final."
United States v. Mason Hanger Co.
260 U.S. 323 (1922) Cited 36 times
In United States v. Mason Hanger Co., 260 U.S. 323 (1922), the contractor was paid in accordance with a disputes decision in his favor, but the Comptroller of the Treasury disagreed with the decision and subsequently deducted the amount paid from other sums due the contractor.

McMullen Leavens Co.

13 Cited authorities

Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

Holding that "the term ‘including’ is not one of all-embracing definition, but connotes simply an illustrative application of the general principle."

Describing the Board's goals for its election rules and regulations

In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

Holding that states can regulate maritime insurance provided the regulations do not "conflict with any essential feature of the general maritime law"

Recognizing that "the term `includes' may sometimes be taken as synonymous with `means'"

Concluding that seizure of the vessel was the first step in enforcing arbitration, and explaining that it was not necessary for the arbitration panel to "split" the in personam claim against the corporation and the in rem claim against the vessel

In Merrill-Ruckgaber Co. v. United States, 241 U.S. 387, 36 S.Ct. 662, 663, 60 L.Ed. 1058, the contract provided that "the decision of the supervising architect as to the proper interpretation of the drawings and specifications [shall] be final."

In United States v. Mason Hanger Co., 260 U.S. 323 (1922), the contractor was paid in accordance with a disputes decision in his favor, but the Comptroller of the Treasury disagreed with the decision and subsequently deducted the amount paid from other sums due the contractor.