§

McLoughlin Manufacturing Corp.

182 N.L.R.B. 958 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
McLoughlin Manufacturing Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Holmberg v. Armbrecht

    327 U.S. 392 (1946)   Cited 1,365 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Erie does not require federal courts to apply state tolling doctrines to federal causes of action

  2. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal

    359 U.S. 231 (1959)   Cited 485 times
    Holding that whether or not petitioner justifiably relied on respondent's representations was a question of fact that could not “be decided at this stage of the proceedings”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

    361 F.2d 512 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that employer not "relieved of its duty to obey the order to bargain during the pendency of the proceedings to enforce the earlier order"

  4. Local 57, Int. L. Garment W. U. v. N.L.R.B

    374 F.2d 295 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 24 times

    Nos. 19478, 19624. Argued February 11, 1966. Decided January 11, 1967. Certiorari Denied June 5, 1967. See 87 S.Ct. 2074, 2078. Mr. Max Zimny, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Morris P. Glushien, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19478. Messrs. John A. McGuinn, Washington, D.C., and Joseph A. Perkins, Miami, Fla., with whom Mr. Guy Farmer, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners in

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Louisiana Bunkers, Inc.

    409 F.2d 1295 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 7 times
    In NLRB v. Louisiana Bunkers, Inc., 409 F.2d 1295, 1299-1300 (5th Cir. 1969), a case involving a single employer, the court found the charge was timely even though the initial refusal to bargain occurred outside the six-month period, because the employer refused subsequent union requests to bargain.