McKesson Drug Company

5 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. R. L. Sweet Lumber Company

    515 F.2d 785 (10th Cir. 1975)   Cited 28 times

    No. 74-1065. Submitted September 13, 1974. Decided May 13, 1975. Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Charles E. Hoffhaus, Kansas City, Mo. (Hillix, Brewer Myers, Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for respondent. George A. Lowe, Olathe, Kan., on the brief, for intervenor

  2. A.H. BELO CORPORATION

    411 F.2d 959 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 28 times
    Deciding that the employer engaged in dilatory tactics in “causing negotiations to drag out over a year ... delay[ing] negotiations two months in order to reply to the union's original proposal, and when it did, counter[ing] with a sketchy four page paper”
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. System Council T-6

    599 F.2d 5 (1st Cir. 1979)   Cited 5 times

    No. 78-1396. Argued April 13, 1979. Decided May 22, 1979. David F. Zorensky, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Howard E. Perlstein, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief for petitioner. James O. Hall, Boston, Mass., with whom Angoff, Goldman, Manning, Pyle Wanger, Boston, Mass., was on brief for respondents. Joseph C. D'Arrigo

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Hudson Berlind Corp.

    494 F.2d 1200 (2d Cir. 1974)   Cited 4 times
    In Hudson Berlind Corp., supra, we made clear that in determining the existence of a question of representation the Board could examine factors other than the numerical strength of the contending unions.
  5. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Nettleton Co.

    241 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 15 times

    No. 113, Docket 24181. Argued December 11, 1956. Decided January 21, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Owsley Vose and Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Bond, Schoeneck King, Syracuse, N.Y., Tracy H. Ferguson, Syracuse, N.Y., of counsel, for respondents. Before SWAN, MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. SWAN, Circuit Judge. The Board's Decision and Order is reported in 108 N.L.R.B. 1670. It finds that the respondents have violated