§

McKesson Corporation

12-CA-094552 (N.L.R.B. Nov. 4, 2014)
McKesson Corporation

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 279 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23

    484 U.S. 112 (1987)   Cited 349 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a federal court has no authority to review a decision of the NLRB's General Counsel dismissing an unfair labor practice complaint pursuant to an informal settlement in which the charging party refused to join

  3. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 142 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Hooks v. Kitsap Tenant Support Servs., Inc.

    CASE NO. C13-5470 BHS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 13, 2013)   Cited 3 times   5 Legal Analyses

    CASE NO. C13-5470 BHS 08-13-2013 RONALD K. HOOKS, Regional Director of the Nineteenth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. KITSAP TENANT SUPPORT SERVICES, INC., Respondent. BENJAMIN H. SETTLE ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS This matter comes before the Court on Respondent Kitsap Tenant Support Services, Inc.'s ("Kitsap") motion to dismiss (Dkt. 12). The Court has considered the pleadings filed in support

  6. N.L.R.B. v. F. L. A.

    613 F.3d 275 (D.C. Cir. 2010)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 09-1119, 09-1148. Argued January 21, 2010. Decided July 23, 2010. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the Federal Labor Relations Authority. Howard S. Scher, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were William G. Kanter, Attorney, and Ronald E. Meisburg, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board. Rosa M. Koppel, Solicitor, Federal Labor Relations Authority, argued the cause for respondent. With

  7. Section 1001 - Statements or entries generally

    18 U.S.C. § 1001   Cited 7,531 times   308 Legal Analyses
    Making false statements

  8. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,078 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB

  9. Section 153 - National Labor Relations Board

    29 U.S.C. § 153   Cited 388 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Establishing National Labor Relations Board with an explicit removal limitation

  10. Section 3345 - Acting officer

    5 U.S.C. § 3345   Cited 178 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Providing that an Acting Director may be an inferior officer within the PTO

  11. Section 102.15 - When and by whom issued; contents; service

    29 C.F.R. § 102.15   Cited 49 times
    Stating a complaint must "contain . . . clear and concise statement of the facts upon which the Board asserts jurisdiction"