McDonnell Douglas Corp.

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Greyhound Corp.

    368 F.2d 778 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying the Supreme Court's standard to hold that Greyhound and the independent contractor were joint employers
  2. Intnl. U., Ele., R. M. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    307 F.2d 679 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 24 times

    Nos. 16273 and 16301. Argued January 4, 1962. Decided June 7, 1962. Petition for Rehearing Denied in No. 16,273 July 5, 1962. Certiorari Denied December 10, 1962. See 83 S.Ct. 307. Mr. David S. Davidson, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Benjamin C. Sigal, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 16273. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Hotel, Motel Club Empl. U

    320 F.2d 254 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 17 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's finding of § 8(b) and § 8(b) violations for improper securing of employee's discharge, with no discussion of how union's conduct constitutes restraint of employee "in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7" under § 8(b)
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Zoe Chemical Co.

    406 F.2d 574 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 6 times

    No. 29, Docket 31989. Argued October 9, 1968. Decided January 13, 1969. William J. Avrutis, Atty., NLRB (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Charles R. Katz, New York City (Katz Wolchok, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Zoe Chemical Co., Inc. Before FRIENDLY, ANDERSON and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges. FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: Over five

  5. N.L.R.B. v. L. 182, Int'l Bro. of Teamsters

    401 F.2d 509 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 73, 74, Dockets 32267, 32268. Argued September 19, 1968. Decided October 3, 1968. Certiorari Denied March 10, 1969. See 89 S.Ct. 1010. John E. Nevins, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, John D. Burgoyne, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. George Schiro, Utica, N.Y., on the brief, for respondent. Before MOORE, FRIENDLY and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges. FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: The National

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Air Flow Sheet Metal, Inc.

    396 F.2d 506 (7th Cir. 1968)   Cited 4 times

    No. 16522. May 20, 1968. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, William H. Carder, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Attorney, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Max E. Hobbs, Larry T. Miller, Frank A. Higgins, Fort Wayne, Ind., Dale, Duemling Miller, Fort Wayne, Ind., of counsel, for respondent Air Flow Sheet Metal, Inc. Before CASTLE, KILEY and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges. KILEY, Circuit Judge. The National

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Leece-Neville Company

    330 F.2d 242 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 7 times
    In NLRB v. Leece-Neville Co., 330 F.2d 242 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 819, 85 S.Ct. 41, 13 L.Ed.2d 31 (1964), a company discharged seven employees at the union's demand in spite of protests by all the employees that they had paid or tendered their dues.