McClatchy Newspapers, Inc. d/b/a The Fresno Bee

9 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  4. Russell v. Millsap

    479 U.S. 826 (1986)   Cited 80 times
    Applying neutral principles of law approach in determination of trust for benefit of the general church
  5. Adair Standish Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    912 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1990)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that the employer violated the Act by instituting changes in the employees' schedules following the union's certification
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Griggs Equipment, Inc.

    307 F.2d 275 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 52 times
    In Griggs, the issue was not even mentioned in the Board's Decision, but is noted in the decision of the court of appeals.
  7. Vic Koenig Chevrolet, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    126 F.3d 947 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 96-3523 96-3770 ARGUED MAY 21, 1997 DECIDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1997 Wendy L. Nutt, James F. Hendricks (argued), Brittain, Sledz, Morris Slovak, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner, Cross-Respondent. Charles P. Donnelly, Jr., National Labor Relations Board, Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, Elizabeth Kinney, National Labor Relations Board, Region 13, Chicago, IL, Aileen A. Armstrong, William M. Bernstein (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Dothan Eagle, Inc.

    434 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 30 times

    No. 28576. November 2, 1970. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Charles M. Paschal, Jr., Director, N.L.R.B., Region 15, New Orleans, La., David E. Rosenbaum, Atty., N.L.R.B., Silver Spring, Md., for petitioner. C. Dale Stout, William F. Banta, Kullman, Lang, Keenan, Inman Bee, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Upland Freight Lines, Inc.

    527 F.2d 766 (9th Cir. 1976)

    No. 74-1787. January 7, 1976. John D. Burgoyne, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Edward B. Robin, Robin Cohen, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before MERRILL, WRIGHT and CHOY, Circuit Judges. OPINION PER CURIAM: The Board has applied for enforcement of its order issued against Upland Freight Lines (Upland) for violation of section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (engaging in coercive interrogation of, threats of reprisals against, and promise and grant of benefits to employees