McClatchy Newspapers

12 Cited authorities

  1. Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.

    484 U.S. 539 (1988)   Cited 330 times
    Holding that the remedy provided in §§ 515 and 502(g) "is limited to the collection of `promised contributions' and does not confer jurisdiction on district courts to determine whether an employer's unilateral decision to refuse to make post-contract contributions constitutes a violation of the NLRA."
  2. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
  3. Penrod Drilling v. Johnson

    396 U.S. 1003 (1970)   Cited 91 times
    Holding that the arrest of a Navajo Indian on the reservation for extradition pursuant to Arizona law to another state "would clearly interfere with rights essential to the Navajo's self-government"
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Magnavox Co. of Tennessee

    415 U.S. 322 (1974)   Cited 76 times
    In Magnavox, the Board changed its bifurcated rule and adopted the Eighth Circuit's view that the union had no power to waive employee distribution rights on behalf of either itself or another union.
  5. Newspaper Printing Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    625 F.2d 956 (10th Cir. 1980)   Cited 24 times
    Stating that "it is the Board's duty to make the final determination as to whether an unfair labor practice has occurred" and that "insistence to impasse upon a non-mandatory subject of bargaining violates § 8"
  6. United Pack., F. A. W. Int. U. v. N.L.R.B

    416 F.2d 1126 (D.C. Cir. 1969)   Cited 37 times

    Nos. 21627, 21825. Argued November 25, 1968. Decided February 7, 1969. Petitions for Rehearing Denied May 12, 1969. Certiorari Denied November 10, 1969. See 90 S.Ct. 216. Mr. Richard F. Watt, Chicago, Ill., with whom Messrs. Eugene Cotton, Chicago, Ill., and Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 21,627. Mr. Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., entered an appearance for intervenor in No. 21,825. Mr. John Edward Price, Fort Worth, Tex., for petitioner in

  7. N.L.R.B. v. HOUSTON CHAP., A. GEN. CON., AM

    349 F.2d 449 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 35 times
    Stating that work referral system is a mandatory bargaining subject for construction trades
  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.

    169 F.2d 571 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 46 times
    In NLRB v. Budd Mfg. Co., 169 F.2d 571, 577 (6th Cir. 1945), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 905, 69 S.Ct. 411, 93 L.Ed. 441 (1949), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals specifically rejected the notion that the protection afforded by the National Labor Relations Act is a constitutional right.
  9. Flambeau Plastics Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    401 F.2d 128 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 15 times

    No. 16560. August 2, 1968. Certiorari Denied January 13, 1969. See 89 S.Ct. 625. Walter S. Davis, Russ R. Mueller, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. Kenneth R. Loebel, Richard M. Goldberg, Milwaukee, Wis., Goldberg, Previant Uelmen, Milwaukee, Wis., for intervenor. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy S. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Leon M. Kestenbaum, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before CASTLE, Chief

  10. Pattern Makers' Ass'n, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    622 F.2d 267 (6th Cir. 1980)

    No. 78-1011. Argued April 14, 1980. Decided June 5, 1980. George M. Mauer, Jr., Kenneth W. Kalls, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, John D. Burgoyne, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Michael Messitte, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before WEICK, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS and PECK, Senior Circuit Judges. HARRY PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. This case is before the court on the petition of the Pattern Makers' Association