§

Mazzara Trucking & Excavating Corporation

04-CA-116883 (N.L.R.B. May. 7, 2014)
Mazzara Trucking & Excavating Corporation

10 Cited authorities

  1. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

  2. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  3. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  4. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

  5. Roundy's Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    674 F.3d 638 (7th Cir. 2011)   Cited 42 times
    Ruling that because a non-exclusive easement holder does not hold a possessory interest in the underlying fee, the easement holder cannot enjoin a trespasser from using the property absent a showing that the trespasser's use interferes with the easement holder's use

  6. Petrochem Insulation, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    240 F.3d 26 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Deferring to the NLRB's citation of a "company's decision to seek treble damages as additional evidence of retaliatory motive" but noting that "had the suit not been so meritless — our view might be different" (citing Kline v. Coldwell Banker Co., 508 F.2d 226, 235 (9th Cir. 1974) (characterizing antitrust treble damages as punitive))

  7. Venetian v. N.L.R.B

    484 F.3d 601 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 16 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding no unfairness where the court could "discern no difference between the incentives that the [plaintiff] may have had in its Ninth Circuit litigation and its incentives here. The stakes in its attempt before that court were no less than they are now."

  8. Tradesmen Intern., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    275 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 21 times
    Assuming union organizer's activity constituted "concerted activity" under 29 U.S.C. § 157 but holding it was not protected under statute

  9. Metropolitan Dist. Council v. N.L.R.B

    68 F.3d 71 (3d Cir. 1995)   Cited 6 times

    No. 95-3086. submitted October 12, 1995. Filed October 25, 1995. Richard C. McNeill, Jr. sagot, Jennings Sigmond, Philadelphia, PA, kathy Krieger, Washington, DC, David M. Silberman, Laurence Gold, Washington, DC, Cynthia C. Estland, Austin, TX, for Petitioner. Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Acting Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Robert J. Englehart, Margaret G. Neigus, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation