§
Matter of Yauri

11 Cited authorities

  1. Barahona-Gomez v. Reno

    236 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 107 times
    Holding that section 1252(g) barred review of discretionary, quasi-prosecutorial decisions by asylum officers and INS district directors to adjudicate cases or refer them to immigration judges for hearing

  2. Kalilu v. Mukasey

    516 F.3d 777 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 36 times
    Holding Interim Rule Notice "rendered worthless" when BIA denies motion to continue removal proceedings to allow USCIS to adjudicate application for adjustment of status

  3. Sheng Gao Ni v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    520 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that the BIA should have considered whether the facts of the petitioners' cases "warranted a favorable exercise of its discretion" before denying their motions to reopen their removal proceedings based on the regulation at issue here

  4. Melnitsenko v. Mukasey

    517 F.3d 42 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that "the BIA may not deny motion based solely on the fact of the DHS's objection if the BIA denies a motion to reopen based on the merits of the DHS's objection, the BIA must provide adequate reasoning as to why the objection calls for denial of the motion to reopen"

  5. Potdar v. Keisler

    505 F.3d 680 (7th Cir. 2007)   Cited 6 times
    Noting that "the approach [the IJ] took to the case was not responsive to the inquiry the Board had placed before him in granting Mr. Potdar's motion to reopen the proceedings"

  6. Potdar v. Mukasey

    550 F.3d 594 (7th Cir. 2008)   Cited 4 times

    No. 06-2441. Argued February 28, 2007. Decided October 10, 2007. Petition for Rehearing En Banc Filed November 27, 2007. Decided June 26, 2008. On Motion to Reopen Decided December 16, 2008. Appeal from the petitioned for review of order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Mary L. Sfasciotti, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner. Melissa Neiman-Kelting, Department of Justice, Civil Division, Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Before RIPPLE, MANION and KANNE, Circuit Judges. RIPPLE

  7. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,401 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”

  8. Section 1003.2 - Reopening or reconsideration before the Board of Immigration Appeals

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.2   Cited 7,804 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Granting power to Board

  9. Section 245.2 - Application

    8 C.F.R. § 245.2   Cited 500 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Granting USCIS authority to adjudicate applications for adjustment of status outside of removal proceedings

  10. Section 1.1 - Applicability

    8 C.F.R. § 1.1   Cited 158 times
    Providing that LPR status terminates upon the entry of a final order of removal

  11. Section 241.6 - Administrative stay of removal

    8 C.F.R. § 241.6   Cited 60 times
    Providing that Government has discretion to stay removal administratively upon request of alien