Matter of Silver Dragon Chinese Restaurant

9 Cited authorities

  1. Joseph v. Landon

    679 F.2d 113 (7th Cir. 1982)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that an alien “d[oes] not have a vested right upon approval of visa petition”
  2. Madany v. Smith

    696 F.2d 1008 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 18 times
    Using an abuse of discretion standard for former 8 U.S.C. § 1153, now § 1153(b)
  3. K.R.K. Irvine, Inc. v. Landon

    699 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 10 times

    No. 81-5915. Argued July 7, 1982. Submitted October 14, 1982. Decided February 23, 1983. John F. Sheffield, Pasadena, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Katherine V. Tooks, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before ANDERSON, SCHROEDER and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. Judge Reinhardt, originally a member of the panel, is temporarily disabled from participation. Judge Schroeder was randomly selected

  4. Ubeda v. Palmer

    539 F. Supp. 647 (N.D. Ill. 1982)   Cited 9 times
    In Ubeda v. Palmer, 539 F. Supp. 647, 649-50 (N.D.Ill. 1982), aff'd mem., 703 F.2d 571 (7th Cir. 1983), the court concluded that the determination of a petitioning employer's financial viability is one to be made solely by the INS and not the Secretary of Labor.
  5. Stewart Infra-Red Commissary, Etc. v. Coomey

    661 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 3 times
    Holding that, where applicable, the terms of the labor certification are binding on the agency in terms of which qualifications need to be shown
  6. Section 103.5 - Reopening or reconsideration

    8 C.F.R. § 103.5   Cited 208 times
    Authorizing officers to exercise their discretion to excuse untimely filing of motion to reopen or reconsider where movant demonstrates that delay was reasonable and beyond the movant's control
  7. Section 656.30 - Validity of and invalidation of labor certifications

    20 C.F.R. § 656.30   Cited 39 times

    (a)Priority date. (1) The filing date for a Schedule A occupation or sheepherders is the date the application was dated by the Immigration Officer. (2) The filing date, established under § 656.17(c) , of an approved labor certification may be used as a priority date by the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of State, as appropriate. (b)Expiration of labor certifications. For certifications resulting from applications filed under this part and 20 CFR part 656 in effect prior to March

  8. Section 656.21 - Supervised recruitment

    20 C.F.R. § 656.21   Cited 37 times
    Requiring information about alien's qualifications, which employer must provide on Application for Alien Employment Certification
  9. Section 656.20 - Audit procedures

    20 C.F.R. § 656.20   Cited 16 times

    (a) Review of the labor certification application may lead to an audit of the application. Additionally, certain applications may be selected randomly for audit and quality control purposes. If an application is selected for audit, the Certifying Officer shall issue an audit letter. The audit letter will: (1) State the documentation that must be submitted by the employer; (2) Specify a date, 30 days from the date of the audit letter, by which the required documentation must be submitted; and (3)