§
Matter of Ruiz-Lopez

13 Cited authorities

  1. National Cable Telecom. Assn. v. Brand X Internet S

    545 U.S. 967 (2005)   Cited 1,176 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is free within "the limits of reasoned interpretation to change course" only if it "adequately justifies the change"

  2. Partyka v. Attorney General of U.S.

    417 F.3d 408 (3d Cir. 2005)   Cited 91 times
    Holding that "negligently inflicted bodily injury lacks the inherent baseness or depravity that evinces moral turpitude"

  3. Wei Cong Mei v. Ashcroft

    393 F.3d 737 (7th Cir. 2004)   Cited 37 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the distinction between crimes that involve moral turpitude and those that do not corresponds "to the distinction between crimes that are malum in se and crimes that are malum prohibitum"

  4. People v. Dewey

    42 Cal.App.4th 216 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that intent to evade pursuing peace officers in willful and wanton disregard of safety of persons or property is a CIMT—i.e., use of car

  5. Franklin v. I.N.S.

    72 F.3d 571 (8th Cir. 1995)   Cited 34 times
    Upholding BIA determination that involuntary man-slaughter, where alien "recklessly cause[d] the death of her child by consciously disregarding a substantial and unjustifiable risk to life," is a crime involving moral turpitude

  6. State v. Sherman

    98 Wn. 2d 53 (Wash. 1982)   Cited 43 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in the context of the felony flight statute, “ ‘immediately’ means stopping as soon as reasonably possible once signaled by a police officer to halt,” and that given the facts of the case, “the trier of fact could well have found he did not meet the requirements of ‘immediately’ ”

  7. State v. Brown

    40 Wn. App. 91 (Wash. Ct. App. 1985)   Cited 32 times
    Scheduling conflict for deputy prosecutor

  8. State v. Duffy

    86 Wn. App. 334 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 7 times
    In Duffy, the Court of Appeals held that the lawfulness of a police stop is irrelevant to a charge of attempting to elude because the crime is focused solely on the defendant's response to the stop.

  9. State v. Mather

    28 Wn. App. 700 (Wash. Ct. App. 1981)   Cited 22 times
    Interpreting the felony flight statute of the State of Washington

  10. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,717 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  11. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 7,888 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General

  12. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,288 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”

  13. Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status

    8 U.S.C. § 1229b   Cited 5,078 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”