14 Cited authorities
Altamirano v. Gonzales
427 F.3d 586 (9th Cir. 2005) Cited 160 timesFinding petitioner did not violate alien smuggling statute where she knew there was an illegal alien in the car, but she was only a passenger and provided no affirmative act of assistance
Hernandez-Guadarrama v. Ashcroft
394 F.3d 674 (9th Cir. 2005) Cited 87 timesHolding that the admission of a hearsay statement violated due process where the government "failed to make any 'reasonable effort' to produce the hearsay declarant"
Urzua Covarrubias v. Gonzales
487 F.3d 742 (9th Cir. 2007) Cited 72 timesHolding "that alien smuggling under § 1182 continues until the initial transporter ceases to transport the alien"
U.S. v. Mussaleen
35 F.3d 692 (2d Cir. 1994) Cited 65 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding no error where contested portion of redacted statement reached the jury through the testimony of witnesses
U.S. v. Flores-Peraza
58 F.3d 164 (5th Cir. 1995) Cited 31 times 1 Legal AnalysesNoting that § 1325 requires the government to prove how the entry was effected
United States v. Rincon-Jimenez
595 F.2d 1192 (9th Cir. 1979) Cited 54 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that an unlawful entry occurred in violation of Section 1325 when the defendant, "a Mexican citizen, illegally entered the United States . . . by traversing the beach between Tijuana and San Ysidro late at night. Because he did not enter at an officially designated border checkpoint, he never presented himself for the medical examination and inspection required of all entering aliens."
U.S. v. Crawford
815 F. Supp. 920 (E.D. Va. 1993) Cited 4 timesCrim. No. 91-137-N. March 18, 1993. Alan M. Salsbury, Asst. U.S. Atty., Norfolk, VA, for U.S. H. Kowalchick, Norfolk, VA, for Casey A. Crawford. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PAYNE, District Judge. On October 5, 1992, a jury convicted Casey Andrew Crawford of unauthorized reentry into the United States by a previously deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Sentencing was set for December 14, 1992. The sentencing hearing began on that date but was continued until March 9, 1993 to allow
Larios-Mendez v. Imm. Naturalization Service
597 F.2d 144 (9th Cir. 1979) Cited 9 timesNo. 76-2362. January 5, 1979. Irving A. Chavin, Las Vegas, Nev., for petitioner. Lauri S. Filppu, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before ELY, CARTER and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: A United States border patrol officer, patrolling an area of Arizona close to the international border, stopped an automobile driven by Salvador Larios-Mendez, the petitioner, on April 18, 1975. The officer questioned the petitioner about his
Section 1326 - Reentry of removed aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1326 Cited 31,748 times 32 Legal AnalysesDefining offense elements
Section 2 - Principals
18 U.S.C. § 2 Cited 24,424 times 59 Legal AnalysesHolding aiders and abettors punishable as principals under federal criminal law
Section 1101 - Definitions
8 U.S.C. § 1101 Cited 16,720 times 91 Legal AnalysesFinding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
Section 1227 - Deportable aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1227 Cited 8,036 times 41 Legal AnalysesGranting this discretion to the Attorney General
Section 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1324 Cited 3,485 times 43 Legal AnalysesHolding liable any person who "transports . . . or attempts to transport" an alien who has entered the United States in violation of the law
Section 1325 - Improper entry by alien
8 U.S.C. § 1325 Cited 1,345 times 12 Legal AnalysesPenalizing improper entry into U.S. by virtue of willful false statement of material fact