§

Matter of Lujan-Quintana

25 I&N Dec. 53 (B.I.A. 2009)
Matter of Lujan-Quintana

6 Cited authorities

  1. American Immigration Lawyers Asso. v. Reno

    199 F.3d 1352 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 70 times
    Holding that “the 60–day requirement is jurisdictional rather than a traditional limitations period”

  2. Section 1252 - Judicial review of orders of removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1252   Cited 43,557 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding court had no jurisdiction to review "any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b"

  3. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,979 times   74 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  4. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,463 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”

  5. Section 1225 - Inspection by immigration officers; expedited removal of inadmissible arriving aliens; referral for hearing

    8 U.S.C. § 1225   Cited 1,322 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Setting standard for credible fear as "a significant possibility, taking into account the ... statements made by the alien ... and such other facts as are known to the officer, that the alien could establish eligibility for asylum"

  6. Section 1240.1 - Immigration judges

    8 C.F.R. § 1240.1   Cited 172 times
    Granting immigration judge in removal proceeding authority to determine applications for adjustment of status