§
Matter of Echeverria

15 Cited authorities

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La Cuesta

    458 U.S. 141 (1982)   Cited 1,605 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a regulation authorizing federal savings-and-loan associations to include due-on-sale clauses in mortgage contracts conflicted with a state-court doctrine that such clauses were un-enforceable

  2. Wakkary v. Holder

    558 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 1,280 times
    Holding that evidence of widespread discrimination against a particular ethnic group did not compel the conclusion that there was a pattern or practice of persecution

  3. Chase Bank USA, N. A. v. McCoy

    562 U.S. 195 (2011)   Cited 248 times
    Finding regulation ambiguous where each party's interpretation was "plausible, and the text alone [did] not permit a more definitive reading"

  4. Perry v. Commerce Loan Co.

    383 U.S. 392 (1966)   Cited 147 times
    Finding that when the plain meaning "has led to absurd or futile results" courts have reasonably followed the purpose, rather than the literal words

  5. Ruiz-Martinez v. Mukasey

    516 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 77 times
    Holding that " § 1252(b) is indeed jurisdictional in nature" and "therefore ... reject[ing] Petitioners’ argument that the applicable limitations period of 30 days is subject to equitable tolling"

  6. De Leon-Ochoa v. Attorney General of the United States

    622 F.3d 341 (3d Cir. 2010)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that the Chevron inquiry ends "if Congress has spoken directly to the question at issue, in which case 'both the agency and the court must give effect to the plain language of the statute.'"

  7. Johnson v. Ashcroft

    286 F.3d 696 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that unless remand from the BIA is "qualified or limited to a specific purpose," an IJ may consider "any and all matters [he] ... deem appropriate in the exercise of his administrative discretion or which are brought to his attention in compliance with the appropriate regulations"

  8. Kasnecovic v. Gonzales

    400 F.3d 812 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 32 times

    No. 03-70775. Argued and Submitted September 8, 2004. Filed March 11, 2005. Robert B. Jobe and Nicole Simon, Law Office of Robert B. Jobe, San Francisco, CA, for the petitioner. John S. Hogan, United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for the respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before B. FLETCHER, LEAVY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges. LEAVY, Circuit Judge. Ferida Kasnecovic, a native and citizen

  9. Cervantes v. Holder

    597 F.3d 229 (4th Cir. 2010)   Cited 17 times
    Ruling that the BIA's rejection of derivative presence and residency was reasonable

  10. Singh v. Mukasey

    536 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 18 times
    Holding BIA may deny motion to reopen based on failure to establish prima facie case for relief sought

  11. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 7,924 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General

  12. Section 1254a - Temporary protected status

    8 U.S.C. § 1254a   Cited 243 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an alien granted TPS is "considered as being in, and maintaining, lawful status as a nonimmigrant"

  13. Section 244.2 - Eligibility

    8 C.F.R. § 244.2   Cited 62 times
    Granting certain aliens temporary protected status

  14. Section 1244.2 - Eligibility

    8 C.F.R. § 1244.2   Cited 14 times

    Except as provided in §§ 1244.3 and 1244.4 , an alien may in the discretion of the director be granted Temporary Protected Status if the alien establishes that he or she: (a) Is a national, as defined in section 101(a)(21) of the Act, of a foreign state designated under section 244(b) of the Act; (b) Has been continuously physically present in the United States since the effective date of the most recent designation of that foreign state; (c) Has continuously resided in the United States since such