§
Matter of C-T-L

36 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,242 times   622 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

  2. INS v. Orlando Ventura

    537 U.S. 12 (2002)   Cited 3,419 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that proper remedy is to remand to agency for additional investigation of matter not previously considered

  3. INS v. Elias-Zacarias

    502 U.S. 478 (1992)   Cited 5,179 times
    Holding that central to the asylum statute is that persecution must be on account of a statutorily protected ground, making the assailant's "motive critical"

  4. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

    519 U.S. 337 (1997)   Cited 2,531 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term “employees” carries a different meaning in different sections of Title VII

  5. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

    529 U.S. 120 (2000)   Cited 1,575 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress had not yet empowered the FDA to regulate tobacco products

  6. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,410 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

  7. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.

    513 U.S. 561 (1995)   Cited 1,021 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 12 does not apply to secondary market transactions as the statute's inclusion of the term “prospectus” evinces an intent to limit the Sections's scope solely to the initial public offering

  8. Shrestha v. Holder

    590 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 1,768 times
    Holding that adverse credibility determinations must be based on "specific and cogent reasons" supported by "specific instances in the record that support a conclusion that the factor undermines credibility."

  9. Davis v. Michigan Dept. of Treasury

    489 U.S. 803 (1989)   Cited 889 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the relevant inquiry is whether the inconsistent tax treatment is directly related to, and justified by, `significant differences between the two classes'"

  10. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.

    486 U.S. 281 (1988)   Cited 808 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute

  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,770 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  12. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,712 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"

  13. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,048 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General

  14. Section 1231 - Detention and removal of aliens ordered removed

    8 U.S.C. § 1231   Cited 7,991 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that once petitioner's removal order was reinstated, he was no longer eligible for "relief" in the form of adjustment of status-even if he could obtain a Form I-212 waiver