§
Matter of C-T-L

36 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,271 times   626 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

  2. INS v. Orlando Ventura

    537 U.S. 12 (2002)   Cited 3,423 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that proper remedy is to remand to agency for additional investigation of matter not previously considered

  3. INS v. Elias-Zacarias

    502 U.S. 478 (1992)   Cited 5,185 times
    Holding that central to the asylum statute is that persecution must be on account of a statutorily protected ground, making the assailant's "motive critical"

  4. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

    519 U.S. 337 (1997)   Cited 2,539 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term “employees” carries a different meaning in different sections of Title VII

  5. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

    529 U.S. 120 (2000)   Cited 1,585 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress had not yet empowered the FDA to regulate tobacco products

  6. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,414 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

  7. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.

    513 U.S. 561 (1995)   Cited 1,025 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 12 does not apply to secondary market transactions as the statute's inclusion of the term “prospectus” evinces an intent to limit the Sections's scope solely to the initial public offering

  8. Shrestha v. Holder

    590 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 1,773 times
    Holding that adverse credibility determinations must be based on "specific and cogent reasons" supported by "specific instances in the record that support a conclusion that the factor undermines credibility."

  9. Davis v. Michigan Dept. of Treasury

    489 U.S. 803 (1989)   Cited 893 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the relevant inquiry is whether the inconsistent tax treatment is directly related to, and justified by, `significant differences between the two classes'"

  10. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.

    486 U.S. 281 (1988)   Cited 809 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute

  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,828 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  12. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,751 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"

  13. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,075 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General

  14. Section 1231 - Detention and removal of aliens ordered removed

    8 U.S.C. § 1231   Cited 8,019 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that once petitioner's removal order was reinstated, he was no longer eligible for "relief" in the form of adjustment of status-even if he could obtain a Form I-212 waiver