§
Master Slack

12 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 873 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  3. Nathanson v. Labor Board

    344 U.S. 25 (1952)   Cited 279 times
    Holding that "if one claimant is to be preferred over others, the purpose should be clear from the statute"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Madison Courier, Inc.

    472 F.2d 1307 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 98 times
    Holding that "[i]f the discriminatee accepts significantly lower-paying work too soon after the discrimination in question, he may be subject to a reduction in back pay on the ground that he willfully incurred a loss by accepting an `unsuitably' low paying position"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Company

    360 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 51 times
    Permitting "non-deduction of supplemental earnings . . . where an employee who had spare-time earnings prior to discharge from his regular job continued in the same spare-time job during his period of discharge," and further holding that as long as employee was "moonlighting before his unlawful discharge," amounts earned in any "spare time employment" should not be used to reduce back-pay award

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Midwest Hanger Co.

    550 F.2d 1101 (8th Cir. 1977)   Cited 19 times

    No. 76-1261. Submitted November, 11, 1976. Decided March 3, 1977. David A. Fleischer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Michael S. Winer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. John A. McGuinn, Farmer, Shibley McGuinn Flood, Washington, D.C., for respondents; Guy Farmer, Washington, D.C., on the brief. Appeal

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Arduini Manufacturing Corp.

    394 F.2d 420 (1st Cir. 1968)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that plaintiffs delay of several days in accepting a job offer demonstrated a lack of reasonable diligence in mitigating damages and tolled plaintiffs right to backpay

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. NHE/Freeway, Inc.

    545 F.2d 592 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 3 times

    No. 75-1827. Argued October 22, 1976. Decided December 3, 1976. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John D. Burgoyne and John C. Rother, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Ralph Adam Fine, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondents. Before CLARK, Associate Justice (Retired), FAIRCHILD, Chief Judge, and HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge. Associate Justice Tom C. Clark, United States Supreme Court (Ret.), is sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: This enforcement proceeding, filed by the

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Ellis and Watts Products, Inc.

    344 F.2d 67 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 10 times

    No. 14565. April 7, 1965. Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on petition, for petitioner. Donald E. Calhoun, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and STARR, Senior District Judge. O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge. The matter before us is the National Labor Relations Board's petition for entry of a Supplementary Decree to enforce its award of back pay against respondent

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Bird Mach. Co.

    174 F.2d 404 (1st Cir. 1949)   Cited 20 times

    No. 4219. May 12, 1949. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against the Bird Machine Company for enforcement of an order of the board, wherein the petition was granted, 161 F.2d 589. Thereafter the board filed a motion for an order authorizing it to hold a hearing and make supplemental findings, and for an order respecting remedial action to be taken by respondent. Motion granted in part, and denied in part in accordance with opinion. Leo J. Halloran, Atty., National Labor Relations