§
Mastec/DirecTV

14 Cited authorities

  1. Solitron Devices v. Island Territory of Curacao

    416 U.S. 986 (1974)   Cited 131 times
    Granting enforcement

  2. Amalgamated Cloth. Tex. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    736 F.2d 1559 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 39 times
    Finding the Board's decision not to overturn an election based on anonymous incidents was within its discretion because ordering a rerun election on that basis would “risk futility” and would “be devastatingly unfair to the majority of employees who have voted for the union”

  3. Kux Manufacturing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    890 F.2d 804 (6th Cir. 1989)   Cited 20 times
    Finding conduct of members of in-plant organizing committee not attributable to union

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bostik Division, USM Corp.

    517 F.2d 971 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 35 times
    In Bostik, the Sixth Circuit affirmed the Board's evaluation of twenty incidents—including twelve threats—that occurred during the course of a representation election.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Precision Indoor Comfort Inc.

    456 F.3d 636 (6th Cir. 2006)   Cited 2 times

    No. 05-1783. Argued: June 9, 2006. Decided and Filed: August 2, 2006. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: Gary W. Spring, Roetzel Andress, Akron, Ohio, for Respondent. Colleen M. Leyrer, National Labor Relations Board, Washington. D.C., for Petitioner. ON BRIEF: Gary W. Spring, Roetzel Andress, Akron, Ohio, for Respondent. Colleen M. Leyrer, Aileen A. Armstrong, Fred B. Jacob, National Labor Relations Board, Washington. D.C. for Petitioner. Before: MOORE, COLE, and CLAY, Circuit

  6. Tuf-Flex Glass v. N.L.R.B

    715 F.2d 291 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 22 times
    In Libbey-Owens-Ford, a pro-union employee, Arias, threatened to file an unspecified "complaint" against a fellow employee if the latter did not vote for and tell others to vote for the union.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Griffith Oldsmobile, Inc.

    455 F.2d 867 (8th Cir. 1972)   Cited 35 times

    No. 71-1100. February 22, 1972. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel; Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel; Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel; Charles N. Steele and Steven R. Semler, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., filed appendix and brief for petitioner. William Alexander, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., filed brief for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before LAY, HEANEY and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations

  8. Beaird-Poulan Division, Emerson, v. N.L.R.B

    649 F.2d 589 (8th Cir. 1981)   Cited 23 times
    Reading the determinative factor in Georgetown Dress to be the lack of a professional organizer on the scene

  9. Harlan #4 Coal Company v. N.L.R.B

    490 F.2d 117 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 27 times

    No. 72-1997. Argued June 9, 1973. Decided January 10, 1974. John E. Jenkins, Jr., Jenkins, Schaub Fenstermaker, Huntington, W. Va., on brief for petitioner. Fredric Sagan, N.L.R.B. for respondent; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before WEICK, EDWARDS and McCREE, Circuit Judges. McCREE

  10. Georgia Kraft Co., Woodkraft Div. v. N.L.R.B

    696 F.2d 931 (11th Cir. 1983)   Cited 12 times

    No. 81-7852. January 24, 1983. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 8, 1983. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer, Murphy, J. Roy Weathersby, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner, cross-respondent. James Callear, Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before KRAVITCH, HATCHETT and CLARK, Circuit Judges. HATCHETT, Circuit Judge: In this case we decide that substantial evidence supports enforcement