Holding that under the FAA, a court "may either stay the action or dismiss it outright when . . . the court determines that all of the claims raised in the action are subject to arbitration"
502 U.S. 527 (1992) Cited 156 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent
Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA
Affirming the Board's holding that an employee engaged in concerted activity when he made statements about the company's new break policy at an employee meeting called by the employer to address the policy
Holding that contractual provision allowing employer to adopt or change policies during course of agreement permitted employer to unilaterally change on-call policy
Holding that combined direct and circumstantial evidence proved union ratified its members' unlawful acts where local's officers paid the attorney fees, bail, and fines of members who were arrested in connection with a riot, did not disavow riot, and attempted to hide participation and approval