MasTec, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion

    563 U.S. 333 (2011)   Cited 3,981 times   605 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"
  2. Johnmohammadi v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.

    755 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2014)   Cited 270 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under the FAA, a court "may either stay the action or dismiss it outright when . . . the court determines that all of the claims raised in the action are subject to arbitration"
  3. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent
  4. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 142 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced
  5. Lewis v. Epic Sys. Corp.

    823 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2016)   Cited 124 times   58 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such waivers violate the Fair Labor Standards Act
  6. Murphy Oil United States, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015)   Cited 66 times   103 Legal Analyses
    Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Caval Tool Division, Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corp.

    262 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming the Board's holding that an employee engaged in concerted activity when he made statements about the company's new break policy at an employee meeting called by the employer to address the policy
  8. Enloe Medical Center v. N.L.R.B

    433 F.3d 834 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that contractual provision allowing employer to adopt or change policies during course of agreement permitted employer to unilaterally change on-call policy
  9. Allegheny Ludlum Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    301 F.3d 167 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding unlawful polling when employees were solicited to appear in an anti-union film
  10. BE & K Construction Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    23 F.3d 1459 (8th Cir. 1994)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that combined direct and circumstantial evidence proved union ratified its members' unlawful acts where local's officers paid the attorney fees, bail, and fines of members who were arrested in connection with a riot, did not disavow riot, and attempted to hide participation and approval
  11. Section 1 - "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title

    9 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 12,302 times   211 Legal Analyses
    Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself
  12. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,335 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355