Mason & Hanger Co.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Glenn L. Martin Nebraska Co. v. Culkin

    197 F.2d 981 (8th Cir. 1952)   Cited 42 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming district court's finding that meal periods of firemen and guards was compensable because they remained engaged in the "principal activity of their regular work"
  2. Section 785.14 - General

    29 C.F.R. § 785.14   Cited 67 times   5 Legal Analyses

    Whether waiting time is time worked under the Act depends upon particular circumstances. The determination involves "scrutiny and construction of the agreements between particular parties, appraisal of their practical construction of the working agreement by conduct, consideration of the nature of the service, and its relation to the waiting time, and all of the circumstances. Facts may show that the employee was engaged to wait or they may show that he waited to be engaged." (Skidmore v. Swift,323

  3. Section 785.25 - Illustrative U.S. Supreme Court decisions

    29 C.F.R. § 785.25   Cited 6 times
    Discussing Steiner, King Packing, and the "integral and indispensable" test