Masiongale Electrical-Mechanical

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Clock Electric v. National Labor Relations Bd.
162 F.3d 907 (6th Cir. 1998) Cited 3 times
Nos. 97-5999/6106. Argued: September 24, 1998. Decided and Filed: December 9, 1998. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. No. 8-CA-26560. Tim Tusek, (argued and briefed), Boardman, Ohio, for Petitioner/Cross-Respondent. Aileen A. Armstrong, (briefed), Frederick C. Havard, (briefed), John D. Burgoyne, Robert J. Englehart, Jeffrey Horowitz, (argued and briefed) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, APPELLATE COURT BRANCH, Washington
N.L.R.B. v. Windemuller Elec., Inc.
34 F.3d 384 (6th Cir. 1994) Cited 5 times
No. 92-6240. Argued August 3, 1993. Decided September 14, 1994. Aileen A. Armstrong, Dep. Asso. Gen. Counsel, Peter Winkler (briefed), Margaret E. Luke (argued and briefed), N.L.R.B., Office of Gen. Counsel, Washington, DC, Stephen M. Glasser, Acting Regional Dir., N.L.R.B., Detroit, MI, for N.L.R.B. Peter J. Kok (argued and briefed), Elizabeth M. McIntyre (briefed), Miller, Johnson, Snell Cumminskey, Grand Rapids, MI, for Windemuller Elec., Inc. Construction Employment Services, Inc., pro se. Before: