ยง

Mary Anne Bakeries

164 N.L.R.B. 207 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Mary Anne Bakeries

9 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 61,223 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that officers must inform suspects that they have a right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used as evidence against them, and that they are entitled to the presence of an attorney, either retained or appointed, prior to the interrogation

  2. Gideon v. Wainwright

    372 U.S. 335 (1963)   Cited 8,478 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment requires counsel in all state felony prosecutions

  3. Escobedo v. Illinois

    378 U.S. 478 (1964)   Cited 4,239 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a suspect is interrogated with the goal of eliciting incriminating statements and the suspect has not been warned about his or her right to remain silent, the denial of the opportunity to consult with the suspect's attorney is a violation of the Sixth Amendment

  4. Massiah v. United States

    377 U.S. 201 (1964)   Cited 2,744 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant's Sixth Amendment rights are violated when the government deploys an informant to interrogate the defendant following indictment

  5. Jencks v. United States

    353 U.S. 657 (1957)   Cited 1,103 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendants are entitled to obtain the prior statements of persons to government agents when those persons are to testify against the defendants at trial

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Adhesive Products

    258 F.2d 403 (2d Cir. 1958)   Cited 37 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Adhesive Products Corporation, 2 Cir., 258 F.2d 403, the court held that a written statement or memorandum which a witness had made prior to his testifying and from which he had refreshed his recollection should have been produced for the benefit of counsel in cross-examination.

  7. Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board

    254 F.2d 314 (D.C. Cir. 1958)   Cited 37 times

    No. 11850. Argued May 27, 1957. Decided January 9, 1958. Petition for Rehearing Denied April 11, 1958. Mr. John J. Abt, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, and Mr. Joseph Forer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mr. George R. Gallagher, Gen. Counsel, Subversive Activities Control Board, with whom Messrs. Frank R. Hunter, Jr., and Leo M. Pellerzi, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Subversive Activities Control Board, and Messrs. Harold D. Koffsky

  8. Suess v. Pugh

    245 F. Supp. 661 (N.D.W. Va. 1965)   Cited 14 times

    Civ. A. No. 828-F. September 21, 1965. A. Blake Billingslea, Roderick A. Devison, Fairmont, W. Va., for plaintiff. John H. Kamlowsky, U.S. Atty., John C. Solomon, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fairmont, W. Va., Emmette L. Mosley, Chief Attorney, Veterans Administration, Huntington, W. Va., for defendants. CHRISTIE, District Judge: The broad purpose of this suit is to restrain and enjoin the defendants from terminating the employment of the plaintiff as a physician at the Veterans' Administration Hospital at

  9. Cooper v. United States

    233 F.2d 821 (8th Cir. 1956)   Cited 7 times

    No. 15464. June 8, 1956. George C. Dyer, St. Louis, Mo. (Ray T. Dreher, James F. McCarthy and Edward E. Murphy, Jr., St. Louis, Mo., were with him on the brief), for appellant. Robert E. Brauer and W. Francis Murrell, Asst. U.S. Attys., St. Louis, Mo. (Harry Richards, U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., was with them on the brief), for appellee. Before SANBORN, WOODROUGH and VOGEL, Circuit Judges. SANBORN, Circuit Judge. Carlisle Cooper entered a plea of not guilty to an indictment based on 18 U.S.C. ยง 1621