§

Marshall Durbin Poultry Co.

310 N.L.R.B. 68 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Marshall Durbin Poultry Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Meritor Sav. Bank v. Vinson

    477 U.S. 57 (1986)   Cited 6,590 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that sexual harassment may be actionable under Title VII as discrimination on the basis of sex if it is sufficiently severe and pervasive

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. Henson v. City of Dundee

    682 F.2d 897 (11th Cir. 1982)   Cited 980 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a supervisor makes sexual overtures to employees of both genders, or where the conduct is equally offensive to male and female workers, the conduct may be actionable under state law, but it is not actionable as harassment under Title VII because men and women are accorded like treatment

  4. Transfer v. Southwest Admin

    479 U.S. 1065 (1987)   Cited 225 times
    Holding that the only information that must be disclosed is information necessary to make disclosed information not misleading.

  5. Jones v. Flagship Intern

    793 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1986)   Cited 483 times
    Holding that a termination decision is not pretextual if the employer "had reasonable grounds [for the decision], or in good faith thought it did"

  6. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Scrivener

    405 U.S. 117 (1972)   Cited 83 times
    Holding that protection from retaliation for "fil[ing] charges or giv[ing] testimony" under the National Labor Relations Act extends to an employee who gave a written sworn statement to an NLRB examiner

  9. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  10. Bowling Green-Warren Cty. Comm. Hosp v. N.L.R.B

    756 F.2d 41 (6th Cir. 1985)

    Nos. 84-5206, 84-5321. Cause Argued January 25, 1985. Decided March 5, 1985. Herman L. Allison (argued), Constangy, Brooks Smith, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner. Elliott Moore (argued), Nancy Hunt, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L. R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRITT and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and HILLMAN, District Judge. Honorable Douglas W. Hillman, United States District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting