Mars Sales & Equipment Co.

13 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.
389 U.S. 375 (1967) Cited 233 times
In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.
397 U.S. 920 (1970) Cited 200 times 5 Legal Analyses
Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances
Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
321 U.S. 678 (1944) Cited 269 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8
Labor Board v. Reliance Fuel Corp.
371 U.S. 224 (1963) Cited 133 times
In Reliance Fuel Oil Corp., the Board found that Reliance Fuel Oil Corp. ("Reliance"), a New York corporation engaged in the business of selling fuel oil for heating purposes and servicing oil burners and boilers, was engaged in commerce within the meaning of the NLRA because it had "purchased a substantial amount of fuel oil from Gulf, a company concededly engaged in interstate commerce."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Van Lines
409 U.S. 48 (1972) Cited 71 times
Holding that a statement that striking employees "are being permanently replaced" constituted an unlawful discharge when permanent replacements had not been hired
Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B
414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969) Cited 81 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list
Snow v. N.L.R.B
308 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1962) Cited 30 times
In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.
Int'l Ass'n, M. A.W. v. J.L. Clark Co.
471 F.2d 694 (7th Cir. 1972) Cited 12 times
No. 71-1532. Argued May 10, 1972. Decided November 20, 1972. Rehearing Denied December 29, 1972. Edward J. Fahy, Rockford, Ill., for defendant-appellant. Sheldon M. Charone, Sherman Carmell, Stuart N. Litwin, and Stephen B. Horwitz, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Before KILEY and PELL, Circuit Judges, and GORDON, District Judge. Honorable Myron L. Gordon is sitting by designation from the United States District
Swearingen Aviation Corp. v. N.L.R.B
568 F.2d 458 (5th Cir. 1978) Cited 7 times
No. 77-1095. February 27, 1978. Frank S. Manitzas, San Antonio, Tex., for petitioner, cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Sandra S. Elligers, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the
M.R. R. Trucking Company v. N.L.R.B
434 F.2d 689 (5th Cir. 1970) Cited 13 times
In M.R. R. Trucking Company the court opined that the Board had failed to give recognition to the hard bargaining and exertion of economic force by both sides and to the right of the company to use the stronger bargaining position in which it found itself.

Mars Sales & Equipment Co.

13 Cited authorities

In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

Holding that a statement that striking employees "are being permanently replaced" constituted an unlawful discharge when permanent replacements had not been hired

Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.

In M.R. R. Trucking Company the court opined that the Board had failed to give recognition to the hard bargaining and exertion of economic force by both sides and to the right of the company to use the stronger bargaining position in which it found itself.