§
Marriott Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 61,582 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that officers must inform suspects that they have a right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used as evidence against them, and that they are entitled to the presence of an attorney, either retained or appointed, prior to the interrogation

  2. Escobedo v. Illinois

    378 U.S. 478 (1964)   Cited 4,240 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a suspect is interrogated with the goal of eliciting incriminating statements and the suspect has not been warned about his or her right to remain silent, the denial of the opportunity to consult with the suspect's attorney is a violation of the Sixth Amendment

  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States

    251 U.S. 385 (1920)   Cited 1,724 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding that attempts to use information gleaned from an illegal search "reduces the Fourth Amendment to a form of words"

  4. Brown v. Mississippi

    297 U.S. 278 (1936)   Cited 802 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that convictions resting solely on confessions that were "extorted by officers of the State by brutality and violence" violated the due process clause and the admission of which at trial was "a wrong so fundamental that it made the whole proceeding a mere pretense of a trial and rendered the conviction and sentence wholly void."

  5. Brown v. Walker

    161 U.S. 591 (1896)   Cited 612 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591 (1896), a witness raised the issue, claiming the privilege in a federal proceeding based on his fear of prosecution by a State, but we found that a statute under which immunity from federal prosecution had been conferred provided for immunity from state prosecution as well, obviating any need to reach the issue raised.