§

Marlo Offset Printing Corp.

113 N.L.R.B. 841 (N.L.R.B. 1955)
Marlo Offset Printing Corp.

4 Cited authorities

  1. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  2. Precision Fabricators v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    204 F.2d 567 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 35 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 271, Docket 22653. Argued May 13, 1953. Decided June 22, 1953. Nixon, Hargrave, Devans Dey, Rochester, N.Y., Arthur L. Stern and William B. Lee, Jr., Rochester, N.Y., of counsel, for petitioner. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel; Samuel M. Singer and Melvin Spaeth, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and L. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges. SWAN, Chief Judge. This is a petition by an employer to

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Quincy Steel Cast

    200 F.2d 293 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 31 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Quincy Steel Casting Co., 1 Cir., 200 F.2d 293, another case relied upon by the Board, the factual situation obtaining there is entirely different from that of the instant case, inasmuch as the employee was a molder the greater portion of his working time and there was evidence in the record that any skilled molder was competent to handle the job and that other workers engaged with him testified that the operation was more or less routine.

  4. Majure v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    198 F.2d 735 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 21 times

    No. 13762. July 18, 1952. E.L. Snow, J.A. Covington, Jr., Meridian, Miss., for petitioner. John F. Preston, Jr., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, D.P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., National Labor Relations Board. Before HOLMES, RUSSELL and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RUSSELL, Circuit Judge. L.L. Majure and Mrs. Jo M. Majure, trading as Majure Transport Company, which will be referred to herein as the company, or employer, petition this Court to review and set aside an order