§

Marlin Rockwell Corp.

114 N.L.R.B. 553 (N.L.R.B. 1955)
Marlin Rockwell Corp.

39 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. United States v. White

    322 U.S. 694 (1944)   Cited 603 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination “is a purely personal one” that “cannot be utilized by or on behalf of any organization, such as a corporation”

  3. United Workers v. Laburnum Corp.

    347 U.S. 656 (1954)   Cited 324 times
    Sustaining damages award under state law where union agents "threatened and intimidated . . . plaintiff's officers . . . with violence"

  4. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Co.

    259 U.S. 344 (1922)   Cited 411 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that labor union could be sued for antitrust violations and describing the "affirmative legal recognition of their existence and usefulness and provisions for their protection"

  5. Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co.

    309 U.S. 261 (1940)   Cited 211 times
    In Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co., 309 U.S. 261, we held that the Board had implied authority to institute contempt proceedings for violation of court decrees enforcing orders of the Board.

  6. Pan American Co. v. United States

    273 U.S. 456 (1927)   Cited 99 times
    In Pan American Petroleum Transport Co. v. United States, 273 U.S. 456, 47 S.Ct. 416, 71 L.Ed. 734 (1927), the government sought cancellation of contracts and leases that "were obtained and consummated by means of conspiracy, fraud and bribery."

  7. Newspaper Pub. Assn. v. Labor Board

    345 U.S. 100 (1953)   Cited 31 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 53. Argued November 19, 1952. Decided March 9, 1953. A labor organization does not engage in an unfair labor practice, within the meaning of § 8(b)(6) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, when it insists that newspaper publishers pay printers for reproducing advertising matter for which the publishers ordinarily have no use. Pp. 101-111. (a) The language and legislative

  8. Hamilton Foundry M. v. Int'l M. F. Wkrs

    193 F.2d 209 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 56 times
    In Hamilton Foundry Machine Co. v. International Moulders Foundry Workers, 193 F.2d 209 (6th Cir. 1952), Section 158(d) of 29 U.S.C.A. was interpreted to mean that valid oral agreements were proper in collective bargaining contracts so long as neither party requested a written instrument containing its terms.

  9. Union Starch Ref. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    186 F.2d 1008 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 51 times
    In Union Starch, the employees had tendered dues and an initiation fee but were denied membership in the union for refusal to file union application forms, attend a union meeting or take the union oath.

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. James Thompson

    208 F.2d 743 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 41 times
    Reinstating ALJ's findings after Board reversal

  11. Section 141 - Short title; Congressional declaration of purpose and policy

    29 U.S.C. § 141   Cited 2,060 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Stating Congress' declaration of purpose that "employers, employees, and labor organizations each recognize under law one another's legitimate rights in their relations with each other"

  12. Section 101 - Issuance of restraining orders and injunctions; limitation; public policy

    29 U.S.C. § 101   Cited 1,301 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Stating that no injunction may issue "except in a strict conformity with the provisions of this chapter"

  13. Section 102 - Public policy in labor matters declared

    29 U.S.C. § 102   Cited 150 times
    Declaring public policy underlying Norris-LaGuardia