Mark R. Kunkel Plumbing
4 Cited authorities
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
May Stores Co. v. Labor Board
326 U.S. 376 (1945) Cited 257 timesRequiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
Union Starch Ref. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
186 F.2d 1008 (7th Cir. 1951) Cited 51 timesIn Union Starch, the employees had tendered dues and an initiation fee but were denied membership in the union for refusal to file union application forms, attend a union meeting or take the union oath.
Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
120 F.2d 641 (D.C. Cir. 1941) Cited 33 timesNos. 7503, 7538. Argued February 17, 1941. Decided May 12, 1941. On Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Bethlehem Steel Company and another to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, wherein the Plan of Employees' Representation at the Steelton, Pa., Plant of the Bethlehem Steel Company and another intervened in support of the petition and the Steel Workers Organizing Committee intervened in support of the order