§

Marion D. Tyler, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (S.E./S.W. Areas), Agency.

01a00180 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 17, 2000)
Marion D. Tyler, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (S.E./S.W. Areas), Agency.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,575 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody

    422 U.S. 405 (1975)   Cited 2,615 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employment policy cannot stand if another policy, "without a similarly undesirable racial effect, would also serve the employer's legitimate interest"

  3. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,614 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"