§

Maria T. Darr, Complainant, v. Gary Locke, Secretary, Department of Commerce, (Bureau of the Census), Agency.

0120110446 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 10, 2011)
Maria T. Darr, Complainant, v. Gary Locke, Secretary, Department of Commerce, (Bureau of the Census), Agency.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,671 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,624 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

  3. Valentino v. United States Postal Service

    674 F.2d 56 (D.C. Cir. 1982)   Cited 163 times
    Holding that statistics that "did not demonstrate that women received grade increases less often than men as a regular occurrence" failed to establish disparate impact

  4. Clark v. Olinkraft, Inc.

    556 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1977)   Cited 58 times
    Finding a continuing violation where the plaintiff was denied promotions